<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Colorado Health Insurance Insider - Latest Comments in Medicare Buy In Option A Good Idea</title><link>http://colohealthins.disqus.com/</link><description>Colorado health insurance principles, research and support.</description><atom:link href="https://colohealthins.disqus.com/medicare_buy_in_option_a_good_idea/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:55:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Medicare Buy In Option A Good Idea</title><link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/12/30/medicare-buy-in-option-a-good-idea/#comment-353153606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article,I would like to say that certainly medicare has got some advantage over the health care plan.But this vary person to person.No plan can give you 100% security and reliability.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alish</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:55:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Medicare Buy In Option A Good Idea</title><link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/12/30/medicare-buy-in-option-a-good-idea/#comment-353153603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louise, 60% of the private sector health plans already are nonprofit   (&lt;a href="http://www.nonprofithealthcare.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.nonprofithealthcare.org"&gt;www.nonprofithealthcare.org&lt;/a&gt;)...so some of that logic is undercut. You're right, providers would make less on these patients, and who do they make it up on? Private sector - the rest of us foot the bill, that's just adding to the problem we already have.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plus, the private sector industry groups (AHIP, Blues - full disclosure, I work for one) have already agreed to the concept of eliminating medical underwriting, just so it's done across the board so all play by the same rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who pays the tab doesn't change the underlying problem that we have runaway demand for very expensive care supplied by an inefficient system. Not saying this is a bad idea, just saying it's a patch job for the uninsured, interim humanitarian step, not the scope of reform needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susan Fitzgerald</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Medicare Buy In Option A Good Idea</title><link>http://www.healthinsurancecolorado.net/blog1/2008/12/30/medicare-buy-in-option-a-good-idea/#comment-4780071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louise:&lt;br&gt;Public and private insurers use different accounting sytems.&lt;br&gt;Public insurers, such as Medicare, operate on a cash basis, while private insurers operate on an accrual basis.&lt;br&gt;Liabilities for Medicare do not extend beyond the current year, while private insurers account for liabilites that are expected to occur beyond the current year.&lt;br&gt;In addition, reserves in Medicare cannot be converted into cash, while reserves in a private insurer can be converted into cash.&lt;br&gt;At least from an accounting perspective, Medicare has a huge advantage over private insurers.&lt;br&gt;Don Levit&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Levit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>